[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:21:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
> Can't KVM invoke QEMU's emulation capabilities for those things it
> cannot provide itself because of missing host abilities?
You'd have to ask the KVM folks, but I suspect the answer is no. Certainly if
you care about performance then you really don't want to be emulating stuff.
If you know you're going to want to do this this then the solution is to
expose a lowest-common-denominator set of features from the start.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Andre Przywara, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/20
[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration, Charles Duffy, 2009/02/20