[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order
From: |
malc |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:30:32 +0400 (MSD) |
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:37:05PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > It may be more natural, but it is also less safe.
> > >
> > > After all
> > >
> > > if (0 = x) {
> > >
> > > fails compile, while
> > >
> > > if (x = 0) {
> > >
> > > compiles silently even when you didn't mean that.
> >
> > Today gcc will warn you as well. Of course this means you have to look
> > at warnings.
>
> True. You can tell it off by doing if ((x = 0)) it seems.
Bings back warm and fuzzy memories of: http://kerneltrap.org/node/1584
>
> Always safer to treat warnings as errors it seems.
>
>
--
mailto:address@hidden
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, M. Warner Losh, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Lennart Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Jamie Lokier, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Jamie Lokier, 2009/04/23
[Qemu-devel] Re: [7234] Use a more natural order, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [7234] Use a more natural order, Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/04/24