Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23

[Jes Sorensen]

On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I don't think we can pull in:
>
> - extboot
> - ia64
> - in-kernel pit[1]
> - associated command line options
> - device passthrough
>
> The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually use
> qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is "no", what set of
> things do we need in order for people to focus on qemu.git instead of
> qemu-kvm.git.

I am not sure if anyone is still actively working on ia64. According to
the qemu-kvm.git logs, there hasn't been any real ia64 changes to the
code since my last commit in June of last year and then a couple of
minor configure bits.

IMHO we can just let it rot - not sure if Xiantao is still interested?

Cheers,
Jes