[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:40:02 +0000 |
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Avi Kivity <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 09/05/2010 05:10 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> Easy to use GUI and integration to host system are important, but
>> performance is also a big problem. QEMU/TCG can't compete with
>> alternatives that use proprietary kernel modules. Someone should
>> recreate kqemu by using KVM compatible interfaces.
>
> If someone is really willing to invest the effort to do that cleanly, I am
> willing to merge it into kvm. That would allow reuse of the mmu and some
> other logic that got a lot of effort in kvm.
>
> However, I doubt it is worth the effort, if anyone is interested in
> performance then they'd get a cpu that supports virtualization.
>
> That leaves non-Linux. Can qemu really compete there for x86-on-x86? I
> doubt it.
Someone could also make a KVM compatible module for non-Linux hosts
with virtualization capable CPUs. Wouldn't that solve most performance
problems?
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Andreas Färber, 2010/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Avi Kivity, 2010/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Anthony Liguori, 2010/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Avi Kivity, 2010/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Blue Swirl, 2010/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, Avi Kivity, 2010/09/05
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unmaintained QEMU builds, malc, 2010/09/05