Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 44/55] spitz tosa: Simplify "drive is suitable for microdrive" test

[Markus Armbruster]

andrzej zaborowski <address@hidden> writes:

> On 3 August 2011 20:24, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> andrzej zaborowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>> On 3 August 2011 18:38, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> andrzej zaborowski <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>                                                      2. if the
>>>>> underlaying storage can disappear for any other reason if that's
>>>>> possible to check.
>>>>
>>>> bdrv_is_removable() *isn't* such a check.
>>>
>>> Obviously I wasn't claiming it is, just that it might be useful, but
>>> not necessrily possible.  After all pretty much any storage can be
>>> "ejected" with enough force, depending on how far you want to go.
>>>
>>>>>> What's wrong with that again?  All sounds sensible to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not claiming otherwise, just double-checking this is what you want.
>>>
>>> So first you said you had a problem with _is_removable, and then you
>>> said nothing was wrong with the implementation you outlined, plase
>>> make up your mind.
>>
>> I don't appreciate you quoting me out of context like that.
>
> I got quite annoyed when you started putting words in my mouth by
> saying I said anything about CD-ROM.. the code in spitz/tosa is not

I didn't intend to annoy.  It was an honest attempt to figure out what
you want to accomplish there.  Sorry it came out the wrong way.

[...]