qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/35] scsi: remove devs array from SCSIBus


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/35] scsi: remove devs array from SCSIBus
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:03:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0

On 10/21/2011 02:31 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>  diff --git a/hw/esp.c b/hw/esp.c
>  index d3fb1c6..8e17005 100644
>  --- a/hw/esp.c
>  +++ b/hw/esp.c
>  @@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ static uint32_t get_cmd(ESPState *s, uint8_t *buf)
>            s->async_len = 0;
>        }
>
>  -    if (target>= ESP_MAX_DEVS || !s->bus.devs[target]) {
>  +    s->current_dev = scsi_device_find(&s->bus, target, 0);
>  +    if (!s->current_dev) {
>            // No such drive
>            s->rregs[ESP_RSTAT] = 0;
>            s->rregs[ESP_RINTR] = INTR_DC;
>  @@ -225,7 +226,6 @@ static uint32_t get_cmd(ESPState *s, uint8_t *buf)
>            esp_raise_irq(s);
>            return 0;
>        }
>  -    s->current_dev = s->bus.devs[target];
>        return dmalen;
>    }
>
>  @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static void do_busid_cmd(ESPState *s, uint8_t *buf, 
uint8_t busid)
>
>        trace_esp_do_busid_cmd(busid);
>        lun = busid&  7;
>  +    s->current_dev = scsi_device_find(&s->bus, s->current_dev->id, lun);
This is new, and I can't see an explanation in the commit log.

It isn't really new; up until now the lun was hard-coded to zero and so s->current_dev could be set in get_cmd. Now we have to delay it until do_busid_cmd because we actually have a place to pass the LUN.

That said, s->current_dev is never really used outside do_busid_cmd, so I can instead do something like:

-   s->current_req = scsi_req_new(s->current_dev, 0, lun, buf, NULL);
+   SCSIDevice *current_lun;
+
+   current_lun = scsi_device_find(&s->bus, 0, s->current_dev->id, lun);
+   s->current_req = scsi_req_new(current_lun, 0, lun, buf, NULL);

That would be the same as the code I have above.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]