qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add socket/xnet libs to configure for Solar


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Add socket/xnet libs to configure for Solaris
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:46:53 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0

Am 27.03.2012 19:24, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 13:56, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [...] While the MAINTAINER host support
>> sections do not list me (they're still new in there), Solaris patches
>> have traditionally gone through me, so that is not a particular reaction
>> to the contents of form of Lee's patches, I am serious.
> 
> I'm a bit surprised about this claim, I think I haven't been aware of
> this route. When did Solaris patches go through you, could you name
> some?

Just stumbled over this branch with
e88131d2177cf12dba99c13fe5ff6a21d8fb7dc1 from Sep 19, 2010 at its head:

http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/afaerber.git/shortlog/refs/heads/solaris

Guess whom it was committed by?
http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu.git/commit/e78815a554adaa551d62a71be10ee2fcf128e473

As you can see, the more recent C99 patch - which Avi offered to write
in response to my(!) report - is not in there, since this branch is
still from my old OpenSolaris machine that I screwed up during an
attempted migration to OpenIndiana.
But like I said elsewhere, further patches are not strictly needed when
building without guest agent and tracing and running in a bash
environment, thus no need for tons of patches for a working platform.

So had you wanted to, it would've been really easy to find evidence that
I was the last one around here working on Solaris/illumos support.

Andreas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]