qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Prop-ptr and Xilinx.


From: Peter Crosthwaite
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Prop-ptr and Xilinx.
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:43:01 +1000

Up and running Paolo,

Interfaces now tested as working in a machine :)

I had to hack-up QOM a little bit for it all to work, creating a
series (hacks and all) so it can be discussed.

Regards,
Peter

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> Il 13/06/2012 08:21, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>>
>> Im testing your revisions the the xilinx ip around getting rid of the
>> pointer props (your prop-ptr branch on your github).
>>
>> First up theres a typo in the machine model stuff, heres the fix:
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c b/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c
>> index 37866f4..e718183 100644
>> --- a/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c
>> +++ b/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c
>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ petalogix_ml605_init(ram_addr_t ram_size,
>>      xilinx_timer_create(TIMER_BASEADDR, irq[2], 2, 100 * 1000000);
>>
>>      /* axi ethernet and dma initialization. */
>> -    DeviceState *dma = qdev_create(NULL, "xilinx-axidma");
>> +    DeviceState *dma = qdev_create(NULL, "xilinx,axidma");
>>      DeviceState *eth0;
>>
>>      eth0 = xilinx_axiethernet_create(&nd_table[0], XILINX_AXIDMA_PEER(dma),
>>
>> I corrected this and ran it but SIGABRT'ed on some assertion in the
>> qom framework:
>
> It's quite possible that interfaces are borked, since we have no unit
> tests and no user. :/

Alrighty,

So if this is the first user, then maybe its the smoke-test case?
Preparing a test package now.

Regards,
Peter

>
> Paolo
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]