Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] versatile: Push lsi initialization to the end

[Peter Maydell]

On 5 October 2012 19:01, Jan Kiszka <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of this either, but the alternatives are way more
> complicated. We either need to rewrite the chardev subsystem,
> specifically how mux'ed devices are registered and how the active one is
> selected. Or we need to avoid flushing "unrelated" BHs for block
> devices. Not sure of those read requests can be postponed.

Is this a regression? If it is then the obvious answer is to back
out whatever broke it...

-- PMM