qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio: virtio-blk data plane


From: Asias He
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] virtio: virtio-blk data plane
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:22:42 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2

On 11/20/2012 11:03 PM, Khoa Huynh wrote:
> Asias He <address@hidden> wrote on 11/20/2012 03:02:07 AM:
> 
>> From: Asias He <address@hidden>
>> To: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>,
>> Cc: address@hidden, Anthony Liguori/Austin/address@hidden, Paolo
>> Bonzini <address@hidden>, Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>,
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden>, Khoa Huynh/Austin/address@hidden
>> Date: 11/20/2012 03:01 AM
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] virtio: virtio-blk data plane
>>
>> Hello Stefan,
>>
>> On 11/15/2012 11:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > This series adds the -device virtio-blk-pci,x-data-plane=on property
> that
>> > enables a high performance I/O codepath.  A dedicated thread is
>> used to process
>> > virtio-blk requests outside the global mutex and without going
>> through the QEMU
>> > block layer.
>> >
>> > Khoa Huynh <address@hidden> reported an increase from 140,000
>> IOPS to 600,000
>> > IOPS for a single VM using virtio-blk-data-plane in July:
>> >
>> >   http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/94580
>> >
>> > The virtio-blk-data-plane approach was originally presented at
>> Linux Plumbers
>> > Conference 2010.  The following slides contain a brief overview:
>> >
>> >   http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw/system/presentations/651/
>> original/Optimizing_the_QEMU_Storage_Stack.pdf
>> >
>> > The basic approach is:
>> > 1. Each virtio-blk device has a thread dedicated to handling ioeventfd
>> >    signalling when the guest kicks the virtqueue.
>> > 2. Requests are processed without going through the QEMU block layer
> using
>> >    Linux AIO directly.
>> > 3. Completion interrupts are injected via irqfd from the dedicated
> thread.
>> >
>> > To try it out:
>> >
>> >   qemu -drive
> if=none,id=drive0,cache=none,aio=native,format=raw,file=...
>> >        -device virtio-blk-pci,drive=drive0,scsi=off,x-data-plane=on
>>
>>
>> Is this the latest dataplane bits:
>> (git://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git virtio-blk-data-plane)
>>
>> commit 7872075c24fa01c925d4f41faa9d04ce69bf5328
>> Author: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
>> Date:   Wed Nov 14 15:45:38 2012 +0100
>>
>>     virtio-blk: add x-data-plane=on|off performance feature
>>
>>
>> With this commit on a ramdisk based box, I am seeing about 10K IOPS with
>> x-data-plane on and 90K IOPS with x-data-plane off.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> 
> Hi Asias, I'll try this latest patchset next week and will report results
> as soon as they are available.  I am currently on vacation this week due
> to the Thanksgivings holiday in the US.... (Previously, I was able to get
> up to 1.33 million IOPS for a single KVM guest using Stefan's previous
> code.)

Hi Khoa, Thanks! Yes, I saw that number in your slides.

> 
> Thanks,
> -Khoa
> 
>>
>> Command line I used:
>>
>> IMG=/dev/ram0
>> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \
>> -drive file=/root/img/sid.img,if=ide \
>> -drive file=${IMG},if=none,cache=none,aio=native,id=disk1 -device
>> virtio-blk-pci,x-data-plane=off,drive=disk1,scsi=off \
>> -kernel $KERNEL -append "root=/dev/sdb1 console=tty0" \
>> -L /tmp/qemu-dataplane/share/qemu/ -nographic -vnc :0 -enable-kvm -m
>> 2048 -smp 4 -cpu qemu64,+x2apic -M pc
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Limitations:
>> >  * Only format=raw is supported
>> >  * Live migration is not supported
>> >  * Block jobs, hot unplug, and other operations fail with -EBUSY
>> >  * I/O throttling limits are ignored
>> >  * Only Linux hosts are supported due to Linux AIO usage
>> >
>> > The code has reached a stage where I feel it is ready to merge.
>  Users have
>> > been playing with it for some time and want the significant
>> performance boost.
>> >
>> > We are refactoring QEMU to get rid of the global mutex.  I believe that
>> > virtio-blk-data-plane can eventually become the default mode of
> operation.
>> >
>> > Instead of waiting for global mutex removal efforts to finish, I
> want to use
>> > virtio-blk-data-plane as an example device for AioContext and
> threaded hw
>> > dispatch refactoring.  This means:
>> >
>> > 1. When the block layer can bind to an AioContext and execute I/O
>> outside the
>> >    global mutex, virtio-blk-data-plane can use this (and gain image
> format
>> >    support).
>> >
>> > 2. When hw dispatch no longer needs the global mutex we can use
> hw/virtio.c
>> >    again and perhaps run a pool of iothreads instead of dedicated
> data plane
>> >    threads.
>> >
>> > But in the meantime, I have cleaned up the virtio-blk-data-plane
>> code so that
>> > it can be merged as an experimental feature.
>> >
>> > Changes from the RFC v9:
>> >  * Add x-data-plane=on|off option and coexist with regular
> virtio-blk code
>> >  * Create thread from BH so it inherits iothread cpusets
>> >  * Drain requests on vm_stop() so stopped guest does not access
> image file
>> >  * Add migration blocker
>> >  * Add bdrv_in_use() to prevent block jobs and other operations
>> that can interfere
>> >  * Drop IOQueue request merging for simplicity
>> >  * Drop ioctl interrupt injection and always use irqfd for simplicity
>> >  * Major cleanup to split up source files
>> >  * Rebase from qemu-kvm.git onto qemu.git
>> >  * Address Michael Tsirkin's review comments
>> >
>> > Stefan Hajnoczi (7):
>> >   raw-posix: add raw_get_aio_fd() for virtio-blk-data-plane
>> >   configure: add CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK_DATA_PLANE
>> >   dataplane: add virtqueue vring code
>> >   dataplane: add event loop
>> >   dataplane: add Linux AIO request queue
>> >   dataplane: add virtio-blk data plane code
>> >   virtio-blk: add x-data-plane=on|off performance feature
>> >
>> >  block.h                    |   9 +
>> >  block/raw-posix.c          |  34 ++++
>> >  configure                  |  21 +++
>> >  hw/Makefile.objs           |   2 +-
>> >  hw/dataplane/Makefile.objs |   3 +
>> >  hw/dataplane/event-poll.c  | 109 ++++++++++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/event-poll.h  |  40 +++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/ioq.c         | 118 +++++++++++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/ioq.h         |  57 +++++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/virtio-blk.c  | 414 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> +++++++++++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/virtio-blk.h  |  41 +++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/vring.c       | 321 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  hw/dataplane/vring.h       |  54 ++++++
>> >  hw/virtio-blk.c            |  59 ++++++-
>> >  hw/virtio-blk.h            |   1 +
>> >  hw/virtio-pci.c            |   3 +
>> >  trace-events               |   9 +
>> >  17 files changed, 1293 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/Makefile.objs
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/event-poll.c
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/event-poll.h
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/ioq.c
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/ioq.h
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/virtio-blk.h
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/vring.c
>> >  create mode 100644 hw/dataplane/vring.h
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Asias
>>
> 


-- 
Asias



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]