[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt
|
From: |
Peter Maydell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:57:06 +0100 |
On 11 July 2013 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any objections to a tree wide:
>
> s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt
No objection from me...
> FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API,
> in this case that API clearly being "fdt_" not "devtree_". It buys
> back a previous 4 chars, in line length, with line length being an
> obstacle to adding "_nofail" versions of the APIs as we should.
...and I'd definitely like to see a cleanup of our error handling
in these wrapper functions (I guess we should use Error**?)
thanks
-- PMM