qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH arm-devs v1 13/13] net/cadence_gem: Dont rx pack


From: Peter Crosthwaite
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH arm-devs v1 13/13] net/cadence_gem: Dont rx packets when no rx buffer available
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:21:50 +1000

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 07:16, Peter Crosthwaite
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Missing apostrophe in Subject.
>
>> Return false from can_recieve() when no valid buffer descriptor is
>
> "can_receive"
>
>> available. Ensures against mass packet droppage in some applications.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>
>>  hw/net/cadence_gem.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
>> index 8c2d8fc..a0499ac 100644
>> --- a/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
>> +++ b/hw/net/cadence_gem.c
>> @@ -463,6 +463,15 @@ static int gem_can_receive(NetClientState *nc)
>>          return 0;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (rx_desc_get_ownership(s->rx_desc) == 1) {
>> +        if (s->can_rx_state != 2) {
>> +            s->can_rx_state = 2;
>> +            DB_PRINT("cant receive - busy buffer descriptor 0x%x\n",
>
> "can't".
>

All fixed,

Regards,
Peter

>> +                     s->rx_desc_addr);
>> +        }
>> +        return 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>>      if (s->can_rx_state != 0) {
>>          s->can_rx_state = 0;
>>          DB_PRINT("can receive 0x%x\n", s->rx_desc_addr);
>> @@ -1144,7 +1153,7 @@ static void gem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, 
>> uint64_t val,
>>              /* Reset to start of Q when transmit disabled. */
>>              s->tx_desc_addr = s->regs[GEM_TXQBASE];
>>          }
>> -        if (val & GEM_NWCTRL_RXENA) {
>> +        if (gem_can_receive(qemu_get_queue(s->nic))) {
>>              qemu_flush_queued_packets(qemu_get_queue(s->nic));
>>          }
>>          break;
>> --
>> 1.8.4.4
>>
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]