qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 1/6] sb16: remove useless mixer_write_in


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3 1/6] sb16: remove useless mixer_write_indexw
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:21:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0


On 31/03/2015 13:19, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 30.03.2015 um 13:45 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> ioport.c is already able to split a 16-bit access into two 8-bit
>> accesses to consecutive ports.  Tested with Epic Pinball.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  hw/audio/sb16.c | 7 -------
>>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/audio/sb16.c b/hw/audio/sb16.c
>> index 444eb9e..b052de5 100644
>> --- a/hw/audio/sb16.c
>> +++ b/hw/audio/sb16.c
>> @@ -1121,12 +1121,6 @@ static IO_WRITE_PROTO (mixer_write_datab)
>>      s->mixer_regs[s->mixer_nreg] = val;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static IO_WRITE_PROTO (mixer_write_indexw)
>> -{
>> -    mixer_write_indexb (opaque, nport, val & 0xff);
>> -    mixer_write_datab (opaque, nport, (val >> 8) & 0xff);
>> -}
> 
> I assume you've verified the endianness handling, too?

Yes, it's little-endian in either case:

        mrp->write(mrpio->portio_opaque, mrp->base + addr, data & 0xff);
        mrp->write(mrpio->portio_opaque, mrp->base + addr + 1, data >> 8);

for the sb16, index is 0x224 and data is 0x225.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]