[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] About SPRs information
From: |
Chen Gang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] About SPRs information |
Date: |
Sat, 2 May 2015 10:42:42 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
On 4/29/15 21:32, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 4/29/15 05:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 28 April 2015 at 22:32, Chen Gang <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> The related information for cmpexch instruction:
>>>
>>> Description
>>>
>>> Compare the 8-byte contents of the CmpValue SPR with the 8-byte
>>> value in memory at the address held in the first source register. If
>>> the values are not equal, then no memory operation is performed. If
>>> the values are equal, the 8-byte quantity from the second source
>>> register is written into memory at the address held in the first
>>> source register. In either case, the result of the instruc- tion is
>>> the value read from memory. The compare and write to memory are
>>> atomic and thus can be used for synchronization purposes. This
>>> instruction only operates for addresses aligned to a 8-byte boundary.
>>> Unaligned memory access causes an Unaligned Data Reference interrupt.
>>
>> I suggest you look at how existing CPUs handle this kind of
>> atomic operation.
>>
I finished cmpexch(), referenced to store_exclusive() in arm and alpha.
Hope what I have done is correct (I guess, it should be).
- Save information about cmpexch (add additional variable in CPUState).
- Generate an exception for it.
- Process the related exception in main.c with start/end_exclusive()
just like what alpha or arm has done.
Thanks.
> OK, thanks.
>
>> I also suggest you stop adding implementations of *new* instructions
>> and concentrate on getting a basic set into shape for inclusion.
>> The more stuff you keep adding the bigger your patchset is going
>> to get and the harder it is going to get to review.
>>
Reconstruction the code is really very useful, cmp*, shl?add*, V?int_?.
That will not only simplify reading, but also speed up coding.
Thank you for your valuable suggestions again.
>
> For me, current code is not quite much, and really easy enough. At
> present I am still going smoothly (the issues are mainly about
> understanding new instructions which I shall meet).
>
> I still want to reach "display hello world" successfully (it does not
> seem quite difficult to me), then reconstruct current code, and send
> patch to upstream.
>
> But sorry, it seems I can not finish it within this month (and I shall
> try to finish within next month).
>
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] About SPRs information,
Chen Gang <=