[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] About SPRs information
From: |
Chen Gang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] About SPRs information |
Date: |
Sun, 3 May 2015 22:30:19 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 |
After spend two days, I fix the issue below: I misunderstood v4int_l
instruction, so cause this issue.
At present, I met mf (memory fence), I guess, we can just skip it, but I
am not quite sure, welcome any ideas, suggestions and completions for it.
And I almost re-constructed the code (it doesn't change quite much), if
suitable, I shall try to send patches to upstream for reviewing. Welcome
any ideas, suggestions and completions for it.
Thanks.
On 5/2/15 12:09, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hello all:
>
> At present, I met an issue (I guess, it should be my code bug), I am
> analyzing it which may spend quite a few time resources (checking and
> reconstructing the code is helpful for analyzing this issue):
>
> - It is about invalid memory access for ld operation. The related
> tilegx code is "ld r48, r12", the related x86_64 code is
> "mov (%rbx),%rbx".
>
> - The related invalid address is 0x128020 which is near (but a little
> upper) tilegx rsp.
>
> - I have ways for analyzing it: we have the related libc source code,
> and the working flow is not quite complex. But it really needs to
> spend me quite a few time resources on it.
>
> At present, for me, I plan to send the reconstructed code to upstream
> within 2 days, and continue analyzing (so that other members can also
> have a check), but I am not quite sure whether it is suitable.
>
> Welcome any ideas, suggestions and completions.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 5/2/15 10:42, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/29/15 21:32, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 4/29/15 05:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>> On 28 April 2015 at 22:32, Chen Gang <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> The related information for cmpexch instruction:
>>>>>
>>>>> Description
>>>>>
>>>>> Compare the 8-byte contents of the CmpValue SPR with the 8-byte
>>>>> value in memory at the address held in the first source register. If
>>>>> the values are not equal, then no memory operation is performed. If
>>>>> the values are equal, the 8-byte quantity from the second source
>>>>> register is written into memory at the address held in the first
>>>>> source register. In either case, the result of the instruc- tion is
>>>>> the value read from memory. The compare and write to memory are
>>>>> atomic and thus can be used for synchronization purposes. This
>>>>> instruction only operates for addresses aligned to a 8-byte boundary.
>>>>> Unaligned memory access causes an Unaligned Data Reference interrupt.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest you look at how existing CPUs handle this kind of
>>>> atomic operation.
>>>>
>>
>> I finished cmpexch(), referenced to store_exclusive() in arm and alpha.
>> Hope what I have done is correct (I guess, it should be).
>>
>> - Save information about cmpexch (add additional variable in CPUState).
>>
>> - Generate an exception for it.
>>
>> - Process the related exception in main.c with start/end_exclusive()
>> just like what alpha or arm has done.
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>> OK, thanks.
>>>
>>
>>
>>>> I also suggest you stop adding implementations of *new* instructions
>>>> and concentrate on getting a basic set into shape for inclusion.
>>>> The more stuff you keep adding the bigger your patchset is going
>>>> to get and the harder it is going to get to review.
>>>>
>>
>> Reconstruction the code is really very useful, cmp*, shl?add*, V?int_?.
>> That will not only simplify reading, but also speed up coding.
>>
>> Thank you for your valuable suggestions again.
>>
>>>
>>> For me, current code is not quite much, and really easy enough. At
>>> present I am still going smoothly (the issues are mainly about
>>> understanding new instructions which I shall meet).
>>>
>>> I still want to reach "display hello world" successfully (it does not
>>> seem quite difficult to me), then reconstruct current code, and send
>>> patch to upstream.
>>>
>>> But sorry, it seems I can not finish it within this month (and I shall
>>> try to finish within next month).
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>
>
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed