qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-tilegx: Support iret instruction and


From: Chen Gang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target-tilegx: Support iret instruction and related special registers
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 20:19:59 +0800

Oh, sorry, according to the architecture member's reply, this patch is
incorrect. I shall implement iret as "jrp lr".

Thanks.

On 10/1/15 19:01, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Chen Gang <address@hidden>
>
> Acording to the __longjmp tilegx libc implementation, and reference from
> tilegx ISA document, we can left iret instruction empty. The related
> code is below:
>
> ENTRY (__longjmp)
> FEEDBACK_ENTER(__longjmp)
>
> #define RESTORE(r) { LD r, r0 ; ADDI_PTR r0, r0, REGSIZE }
> FOR_EACH_CALLEE_SAVED_REG(RESTORE)
>
> {
> LD r2, r0 ; retrieve ICS bit from jmp_buf
> movei r3, 1
> CMPEQI r0, r1, 0
> }
>
> {
> mtspr INTERRUPT_CRITICAL_SECTION, r3
> shli r2, r2, SPR_EX_CONTEXT_0_1__ICS_SHIFT
> }
>
> {
> mtspr EX_CONTEXT_0_0, lr
> ori r2, r2, RETURN_PL
> }
>
> {
> or r0, r1, r0
> mtspr EX_CONTEXT_0_1, r2
> }
>
> iret
>
> jrp lr
>
> Until now, EX_CONTEXT_0_0 and EX_CONTEXT_0_1 are only used in mtspr, so
> just skip them, at present.
>
> After this patch, busybox sh can run correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <address@hidden>
> ---
> target-tilegx/translate.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-tilegx/translate.c b/target-tilegx/translate.c
> index 421766b..3ae59fe 100644
> --- a/target-tilegx/translate.c
> +++ b/target-tilegx/translate.c
> @@ -563,8 +563,10 @@ static TileExcp gen_rr_opcode(DisasContext *dc, unsigned 
> opext,
> break;
> case OE_RR_X0(FSINGLE_PACK1):
> case OE_RR_Y0(FSINGLE_PACK1):
> - case OE_RR_X1(IRET):
> return TILEGX_EXCP_OPCODE_UNIMPLEMENTED;
> + case OE_RR_X1(IRET):
> + mnemonic = "iret";
> + break;
> case OE_RR_X1(LD1S):
> memop = MO_SB;
> mnemonic = "ld1s"; /* prefetch_l1_fault */
> @@ -1823,6 +1825,8 @@ static const TileSPR *find_spr(unsigned spr)
> offsetof(CPUTLGState, spregs[TILEGX_SPR_CRITICAL_SEC]), 0, 0)
> D(SIM_CONTROL,
> offsetof(CPUTLGState, spregs[TILEGX_SPR_SIM_CONTROL]), 0, 0)
> + D(EX_CONTEXT_0_0, -1, 0, 0) /* Skip it */
> + D(EX_CONTEXT_0_1, -1, 0, 0) /* Skip it */
> }
>
> #undef D
> @@ -1836,9 +1840,11 @@ static TileExcp gen_mtspr_x1(DisasContext *dc, 
> unsigned spr, unsigned srca)
> const TileSPR *def = find_spr(spr);
> TCGv tsrca;
>
> - if (def == NULL) {
> + if (!def) {
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_IN_ASM, "mtspr spr[%u], %s", spr, reg_names[srca]);
> return TILEGX_EXCP_OPCODE_UNKNOWN;
> + } else if (def->offset == -1) {
> + goto tail;
> }
>
> tsrca = load_gr(dc, srca);
> @@ -1847,6 +1853,8 @@ static TileExcp gen_mtspr_x1(DisasContext *dc, unsigned 
> spr, unsigned srca)
> } else {
> tcg_gen_st_tl(tsrca, cpu_env, def->offset);
> }
> +
> +tail:
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_IN_ASM, "mtspr %s, %s", def->name, reg_names[srca]);
> return TILEGX_EXCP_NONE;
> }
> @@ -1856,7 +1864,7 @@ static TileExcp gen_mfspr_x1(DisasContext *dc, unsigned 
> dest, unsigned spr)
> const TileSPR *def = find_spr(spr);
> TCGv tdest;
>
> - if (def == NULL) {
> + if (!def || def->offset == -1) {
> qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_TB_IN_ASM, "mtspr %s, spr[%u]", reg_names[dest], spr);
> return TILEGX_EXCP_OPCODE_UNKNOWN;
> }
>

--
Chen Gang (陈刚)

Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
                                          

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]