[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/1] i2c: Factor our send() and recv() common l
From: |
Frederic Konrad |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/1] i2c: Factor our send() and recv() common logic |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:09:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 |
On 19/10/2015 06:09, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Most of the control flow logic between send and recv (error checking
> etc) is the same. Factor this out into a common send_recv() API.
> This is then usable by clients, where the control logic for send
> and receive differs only by a boolean. E.g.
>
> if (send)
> i2c_send(...):
> else
> i2c_recv(...);
>
> becomes:
>
> i2c_send_recv(... , send);
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>
> ---
>
> hw/i2c/core.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/hw/i2c/i2c.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i2c/core.c b/hw/i2c/core.c
> index 5a64026..d4a8cbb 100644
> --- a/hw/i2c/core.c
> +++ b/hw/i2c/core.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ void i2c_end_transfer(I2CBus *bus)
> bus->current_dev = NULL;
> }
>
> -int i2c_send(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t data)
> +int i2c_send_recv(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t *data, bool send)
Double space here between I2CBus and *bus.
Otherwise it looks ok for me.
Fred
> {
> I2CSlave *dev = bus->current_dev;
> I2CSlaveClass *sc;
> @@ -139,28 +139,32 @@ int i2c_send(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t data)
> }
>
> sc = I2C_SLAVE_GET_CLASS(dev);
> - if (sc->send) {
> - return sc->send(dev, data);
> + if (send && sc->send) {
> + return sc->send(dev, *data);
> + } else if (!send && sc->recv) {
> + int ret = sc->recv(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return ret;
> + } else {
> + *data = ret;
> + return 0;
> + }
> }
>
> return -1;
> }
>
> -int i2c_recv(I2CBus *bus)
> +int i2c_send(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t data)
> {
> - I2CSlave *dev = bus->current_dev;
> - I2CSlaveClass *sc;
> -
> - if (!dev) {
> - return -1;
> - }
> + return i2c_send_recv(bus, &data, true);
> +}
>
> - sc = I2C_SLAVE_GET_CLASS(dev);
> - if (sc->recv) {
> - return sc->recv(dev);
> - }
> +int i2c_recv(I2CBus *bus)
> +{
> + uint8_t data;
> + int ret = i2c_send_recv(bus, &data, false);
>
> - return -1;
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : data;
> }
>
> void i2c_nack(I2CBus *bus)
> diff --git a/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h b/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> index 4986ebc..c4085aa 100644
> --- a/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/hw/i2c/i2c.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ int i2c_bus_busy(I2CBus *bus);
> int i2c_start_transfer(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t address, int recv);
> void i2c_end_transfer(I2CBus *bus);
> void i2c_nack(I2CBus *bus);
> +int i2c_send_recv(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t *data, bool send);
> int i2c_send(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t data);
> int i2c_recv(I2CBus *bus);
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/1] i2c: Factor our send() and recv() common logic,
Frederic Konrad <=