qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 6/9] ppc/xics: Split ICS into ics-


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v4 6/9] ppc/xics: Split ICS into ics-base and ics class
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:06:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0

On 09/20/2016 10:10 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 09/20/2016 08:29 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 09/20/2016 08:02 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>> Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/19/2016 08:29 AM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The existing implementation remains same and ics-base is introduced. The
>>>>>>> type name "ics" is retained, and all the related functions renamed as
>>>>>>> ics_simple_*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This will allow different implementations for the source controllers
>>>>>>> such as the MSI support of PHB3 on Power8 which uses in-memory state
>>>>>>> tables for example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A couple of issues below regarding the class helpers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <address@hidden>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <address@hidden>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  hw/intc/trace-events  |  10 ++--
>>>>>>>  hw/intc/xics.c        | 143 
>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>>>>>>>  hw/intc/xics_kvm.c    |  10 ++--
>>>>>>>  hw/intc/xics_spapr.c  |  28 +++++-----
>>>>>>>  include/hw/ppc/xics.h |  23 +++++---
>>>>>>>  5 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
>>
>>>>>>> @@ -224,9 +224,32 @@ static const TypeInfo xics_common_info = {
>>>>>>>  #define XISR(ss)   (((ss)->xirr) & XISR_MASK)
>>>>>>>  #define CPPR(ss)   (((ss)->xirr) >> 24)
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> -static void ics_reject(ICSState *ics, int nr);
>>>>>>> -static void ics_resend(ICSState *ics, int server);
>>>>>>> -static void ics_eoi(ICSState *ics, int nr);
>>>>>>> +static void ics_reject(ICSState *ics, uint32_t nr)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> +    ICSStateClass *k = ICS_GET_CLASS(ics);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shouldn't that be ICS_BASE_GET_CLASS()
>>>>>
>>>>> The class hierarchy is something like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> ICS_BASE -> ICS_SIMPLE -> ICS_KVM
>>>>
>>>> yes. but if we called  ics_* with an instance of an ics class which is 
>>>> not a ICS_SIMPLE class that will break.
>>>
>>> Correct
>>>
>>>> ICSStateClass is the baseclass, whenever we call methods on a ICSState* 
>>>> object, we should use the method defines in ICSStateClass.
>>>
>>> Hmm, in that case I need to initialize base class methods in
>>> instance_init of ics_simple
>>
>> yes but this is done, no ? I see : 
>>
>> static void ics_simple_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> {
>>     DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>     ICSStateClass *isc = ICS_BASE_CLASS(klass);
> 
> Right.
> 
> Currently, we have this:
> 
> +    ICSStateClass *isc = ICS_CLASS(klass);

oh yes and same in the kvm ICS. The name are bit confusing as we are 
introducing SIMPLE but not the associated macros.

You can check on my 2.8 github branch, I got something working there :

        
https://github.com/legoater/qemu/commit/d0b492707debc7192f0860e2c5fc2daa9fd453ac

Thanks,

C.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]