qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/16] tcg: Make tb_flush() thread safe


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/16] tcg: Make tb_flush() thread safe
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 07:51:48 -0400 (EDT)


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Henderson" <address@hidden>
> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Cc: "serge fdrv" <address@hidden>, address@hidden, "alex bennee" 
> <address@hidden>, "sergey fedorov"
> <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 8:06:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/16] tcg: Make tb_flush() thread safe
> 
> On 09/23/2016 12:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > +    unsigned tb_flush_req = (unsigned) (uintptr_t) data;
> 
> Extra cast?
> 
> > -    tcg_ctx.tb_ctx.tb_flush_count++;
> > +    atomic_inc(&tcg_ctx.tb_ctx.tb_flush_count);
> 
> Since this is the only place this value is incremented, and we're under a
> lock,
> it should be cheaper to use
> 
>    atomic_mb_set(&tcg_ctx.tb_ctx.tb_flush_count, tb_flush_req + 1);

atomic_set will do even.  Though it's not really a fast path, which is
why I went for atomic_inc.

> > +        uintptr_t tb_flush_req = (uintptr_t)
> > +            atomic_read(&tcg_ctx.tb_ctx.tb_flush_count);
> 
> Extra cast?

Yeah.

Paolo

> That said, it's correct as-is so,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> r~
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]