[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel
From: |
Daniel P. Berrange |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:17:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:58:07PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 09/21 14:24, John Snow wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 08/12/2016 05:19 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > Previously all test cases in a category, such as check-qtest-y, are
> > > executed in a single long gtester command. This patch separates each
> > > test into its own make target to allow better parallism.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > This saves 50% of the time "make check takes" compared to on master
> > > (I use -j8). RFC because I'm not sure if the new gcov usage is correct
> > > with the now much higher level of parallism compared to before.
> > > ---
> > > tests/Makefile.include | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include
> > > index 14be491..9bf0326 100644
> > > --- a/tests/Makefile.include
> > > +++ b/tests/Makefile.include
> > > @@ -691,27 +691,29 @@ GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
> > > # gtester tests, possibly with verbose output
> > >
> > > .PHONY: $(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS))
> > > -$(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS)): check-qtest-%:
> > > $(check-qtest-y)
> > > +
> > > +qtest-run-%: tests/%
> > > $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@rm -f *.gcda */*.gcda */*/*.gcda */*/*/*.gcda,)
> > > - $(call quiet-command,QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$*-softmmu/qemu-system-$* \
> > > + $(call quiet-command,\
> > > + $(if $(QTEST_TARGET), \
> > > +
> > > QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$(QTEST_TARGET)-softmmu/qemu-system-$(QTEST_TARGET)) \
> > > QTEST_QEMU_IMG=qemu-img$(EXESUF) \
> > > MALLOC_PERTURB_=$${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$$((RANDOM % 255 + 1))} \
> > > - gtester $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED) $(check-qtest-$*-y)
> > > $(check-qtest-generic-y),"GTESTER $@")
> > > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@for f in $(gcov-files-$*-y)
> > > $(gcov-files-generic-y); do \
> > > - echo Gcov report for $$f:;\
> > > - $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $$f -o `dirname $$f`; \
> > > - done,)
> > > + gtester $< $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED),"GTESTER $<")
> > > + $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV), @echo Gcov report for $<:;\
> > > + $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $< -o `dirname $<`; \
> > > + )
> > > +
> > > +$(foreach target, $(QTEST_TARGETS), \
> > > + $(eval check-qtest-$(target): QTEST_TARGET := $(target)) \
> > > + $(eval check-qtest-$(target): $(patsubst tests/%, qtest-run-%, \
> > > + $(check-qtest-y) \
> > > + $(check-qtest-$(target)-y) \
> > > + $(check-qtest-generic-y))) \
> > > +)
> > >
> > > .PHONY: $(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y))
> > > -$(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y)): check-%: %
> > > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@rm -f *.gcda */*.gcda */*/*.gcda */*/*/*.gcda,)
> > > - $(call quiet-command, \
> > > - MALLOC_PERTURB_=$${MALLOC_PERTURB_:-$$((RANDOM % 255 + 1))} \
> > > - gtester $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED) $*,"GTESTER $*")
> > > - $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@for f in $(gcov-files-$(subst tests/,,$*)-y)
> > > $(gcov-files-generic-y); do \
> > > - echo Gcov report for $$f:;\
> > > - $(GCOV) $(GCOV_OPTIONS) $$f -o `dirname $$f`; \
> > > - done,)
> > > +$(patsubst %, check-%, $(check-unit-y)): check-tests/%: qtest-run-%
> > >
> > > # gtester tests with XML output
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I can't vouch for gcov either, but:
>
> Too bad that this seems to be too big a hammer that breaks the way gcov was
> used: 1) the "rm *.gcda" command now runs in each test, so it's harder to
> get an overall coverage report; 2) there is a risk that the parallism may
> corrupt those files. :(
Almost no one will ever build with gcov support, so how about just
making the "normal" case run in parallel and add a special target
for running under gcov which serializes.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, John Snow, 2016/09/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Fam Zheng, 2016/09/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Gonglei (Arei), 2016/09/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Fam Zheng, 2016/09/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Gonglei (Arei), 2016/09/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Daniel P. Berrange, 2016/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Gonglei (Arei), 2016/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Fam Zheng, 2016/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Gonglei (Arei), 2016/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel, Fam Zheng, 2016/09/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] tests: Run qtest cases in parallel,
Daniel P. Berrange <=