Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] [RFC] Add HAX support

[Stefan Weil]

Am 11.11.2016 um 12:28 schrieb Vincent Palatin:
> I took a stab at trying to rebase/upstream the support for Intel HAXM.
> (Hardware Accelerated Execution Manager).
> Intel HAX is kernel-based hardware acceleration module for Windows and MacOSX.
> 
> I have based my work on the last version of the source code I found:
> the emu-2.2-release branch in the external/qemu-android repository as used by
> the Android emulator.
> In patch 2/5, I have forward-ported the core HAX code mostly unmodified from
> there, I just did some minor touch up to make it build and run properly,
> and fixed the style issues to go through checkpatch.pl.
> I have not included the Darwin support.
> It might contain some outdated constructs and probably requires more
> attention (thus the 'RFC' for this patchset).
> 
> In patch 3/5, I'm removing a good chunk of the support for CPUs without UG 
> mode
> as advised by Paolo to simplify the initial version.
> 
> In patch 5/5, I have put the plumbing into the QEMU code base, I did some 
> clean
> up there and it is reasonably intrusive: i.e.
>  Makefile.target           |  1 +
>  configure                 | 18 ++++++++++
>  cpus.c                    | 87 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  exec.c                    | 16 +++++++++
>  hw/intc/apic_common.c     |  3 +-
>  include/qom/cpu.h         |  5 +++
>  include/sysemu/hw_accel.h |  9 +++++
>  qemu-options.hx           | 11 ++++++
>  target-i386/Makefile.objs |  7 ++++
>  vl.c                      | 15 ++++++--
>  10 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> The qemu_cpu_kick_thread mess in cpus.c is probably still not perfact though.
> 
> The patch 1/5 just extracts from KVM specific header the cpu_synchronize_
> functions that HAX is also using.
> 
> I have tested the end result on a Windows 10 Pro machine (with UG support)
> with the Intel HAXM module 6.0.4 and a large ChromiumOS x86_64 image to
> exercise various code paths. It looks stable.
> I also did a quick regression testing of the integration by running a Linux
> build with KVM enabled.


A full build for Windows needs the patch below to
fix missing declarations, otherwise it fails with
compiler warnings and linker errors.

Stefan


>From 91481639a1005ed3278eb55c77c99bb1bcc135ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 13:09:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix include statements for HAXM support

We need sysemu/hw_accel.h. As sysemu/hw_accel.h already includes
sysemu/kvm.h, that one can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
---
 hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c          | 2 +-
 hw/ppc/ppce500_spin.c       | 4 ++--
 hw/ppc/spapr.c              | 2 +-
 hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c        | 2 +-
 hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c    | 1 +
 target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c     | 2 +-
 target-ppc/translate_init.c | 2 +-
 target-s390x/gdbstub.c      | 1 +
 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
index 5aaa264..abcb85d 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 #include "qapi/error.h"
 #include "hw/hw.h"
 #include "qemu/log.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "target-ppc/cpu.h"
 #include "hw/sysbus.h"

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppce500_spin.c b/hw/ppc/ppce500_spin.c
index cf958a9..eb219ab 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppce500_spin.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppce500_spin.c
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@

 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "hw/hw.h"
-#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "hw/sysbus.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
+#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "e500.h"

 #define MAX_CPUS 32
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 0cbab24..174f4d3 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 #include "sysemu/device_tree.h"
 #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
 #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "kvm_ppc.h"
 #include "migration/migration.h"
 #include "mmu-hash64.h"
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
index 9a9bedf..b2a8e48 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
 #include "qemu/log.h"
 #include "cpu.h"
@@ -9,7 +10,6 @@
 #include "mmu-hash64.h"
 #include "cpu-models.h"
 #include "trace.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
 #include "kvm_ppc.h"
 #include "hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.h"

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
index 0864d9b..4d0775c 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include "s390-pci-bus.h"
 #include "exec/memory-internal.h"
 #include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"

 /* #define DEBUG_S390PCI_INST */
 #ifdef DEBUG_S390PCI_INST
diff --git a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
index fdb7a78..0efc8c6 100644
--- a/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
+++ b/target-ppc/mmu-hash64.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "exec/helper-proto.h"
 #include "qemu/error-report.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "kvm_ppc.h"
 #include "mmu-hash64.h"
 #include "exec/log.h"
diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
index 208fa1e..1a049af 100644
--- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
+++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
@@ -21,10 +21,10 @@
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
 #include "disas/bfd.h"
 #include "exec/gdbstub.h"
-#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
 #include "kvm_ppc.h"
 #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
 #include "sysemu/cpus.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"
 #include "cpu-models.h"
 #include "mmu-hash32.h"
 #include "mmu-hash64.h"
diff --git a/target-s390x/gdbstub.c b/target-s390x/gdbstub.c
index 3d223de..3c652fb 100644
--- a/target-s390x/gdbstub.c
+++ b/target-s390x/gdbstub.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include "exec/exec-all.h"
 #include "exec/gdbstub.h"
 #include "qemu/bitops.h"
+#include "sysemu/hw_accel.h"

 int s390_cpu_gdb_read_register(CPUState *cs, uint8_t *mem_buf, int n)
 {
-- 
2.10.2