[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:17:24 +0100 |
On 13 March 2017 at 15:12, Juan Quintela <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [Making QEMU more modular would help with defeating the legacy
>> and back-compat dragons, though]
>
> That would be ideal, but where to start? Think of something as "simple"
> asd adding a struct of operations that implement the differences for
> TCG, xen and kvm. And you see that you get into having to rewrite lot
> of code after moving to that abstraction just the more simple
> operations.
Oh, indeed, it's a huge and painful amount of work that
doesn't actually produce a product with more features when
you've done it. But if it was simple and easy we'd have
already done it and it wouldn't merit listing on a
"big problems we need to solve somehow" list :-)
thanks
-- PMM
- [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Juan Quintela, 2017/03/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Peter Maydell, 2017/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Alex Bennée, 2017/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Juan Quintela, 2017/03/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2017/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Peter Maydell, 2017/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Juan Quintela, 2017/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Peter Maydell, 2017/03/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Christian Borntraeger, 2017/03/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Greg Kurz, 2017/03/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Laurent Vivier, 2017/03/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Greg Kurz, 2017/03/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call for 2017-03-14, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2017/03/14