qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 29/33] i386/kvm: do not zero out segment flags if seg


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 29/33] i386/kvm: do not zero out segment flags if segment is unusable or not present
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:41:47 +0200

From: Roman Pen <address@hidden>

This is a fix for the problem [1], where VMCB.CPL was set to 0 and interrupt
was taken on userspace stack.  The root cause lies in the specific AMD CPU
behaviour which manifests itself as unusable segment attributes on SYSRET[2].

Here in this patch flags are not touched even segment is unusable or is not
present, therefore CPL (which is stored in DPL field) should not be lost and
will be successfully restored on kvm/svm kernel side.

Also current patch should not break desired behavior described in this commit:

4cae9c97967a ("target-i386: kvm: clear unusable segments' flags in migration")

since present bit will be dropped if segment is unusable or is not present.

This is the second part of the whole fix of the corresponding problem [1],
first part is related to kvm/svm kernel side and does exactly the same:
segment attributes are not zeroed out.

[1] Message id: address@hidden
[2] Message id: address@hidden

Signed-off-by: Roman Pen <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Mikhail Sennikovskii <address@hidden>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <address@hidden>
Cc: Michael Chapman <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
 target/i386/kvm.c | 20 ++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm.c
index 82c72d2..6e7c197 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm.c
@@ -1301,18 +1301,14 @@ static void get_seg(SegmentCache *lhs, const struct 
kvm_segment *rhs)
     lhs->selector = rhs->selector;
     lhs->base = rhs->base;
     lhs->limit = rhs->limit;
-    if (rhs->unusable) {
-        lhs->flags = 0;
-    } else {
-        lhs->flags = (rhs->type << DESC_TYPE_SHIFT) |
-                     (rhs->present * DESC_P_MASK) |
-                     (rhs->dpl << DESC_DPL_SHIFT) |
-                     (rhs->db << DESC_B_SHIFT) |
-                     (rhs->s * DESC_S_MASK) |
-                     (rhs->l << DESC_L_SHIFT) |
-                     (rhs->g * DESC_G_MASK) |
-                     (rhs->avl * DESC_AVL_MASK);
-    }
+    lhs->flags = (rhs->type << DESC_TYPE_SHIFT) |
+                 ((rhs->present && !rhs->unusable) * DESC_P_MASK) |
+                 (rhs->dpl << DESC_DPL_SHIFT) |
+                 (rhs->db << DESC_B_SHIFT) |
+                 (rhs->s * DESC_S_MASK) |
+                 (rhs->l << DESC_L_SHIFT) |
+                 (rhs->g * DESC_G_MASK) |
+                 (rhs->avl * DESC_AVL_MASK);
 }
 
 static void kvm_getput_reg(__u64 *kvm_reg, target_ulong *qemu_reg, int set)
-- 
1.8.3.1





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]