[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/22] configure: factor out list of supported X
From: |
Daniel P. Berrange |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/22] configure: factor out list of supported Xen/KVM/HAX targets |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jul 2017 10:50:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) |
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 11:44:41AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/07/2017 10:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >> +supported_kvm_target() {
> >> + test "$kvm" = "yes" || return 1
> >> + glob "$1" "*-softmmu" || return 1
> >> + case "${1%-softmmu}:$cpu" in
> >> + arm:arm | aarch64:aarch64 | \
> >> + i386:i386 | i386:x86_64 | i386:x32 | \
> >> + x86_64:i386 | x86_64:x86_64 | x86_64:x32 | \
> >
> > IIUC, 'x86_64:i386' is claiming that you can run x86_64
> > KVM guests on an i386 host. I thought that was impossible,
> > only 32-on-64 being allowed not 64-on-32.
>
> You can use qemu-system-x86_64 to run i386 KVM guests, by disabling long
> mode with -cpu. It's not a common scenario though.
Wow, obscure :-)
>
> >> + mips:mips | mipsel:mips | \
> >> + ppc:ppc | ppcemb:ppc | ppc64:ppc | \
> >> + ppc:ppc64 | ppcemb:ppc64 | ppc64:ppc64 | \
> >
> > Same question here with ppc64:ppc suggesting you can
> > run 64-bit guest with KVM on a 32-bit host ?
>
> I'm not sure about this one, but right now it is allowed so this patch
> is not changing anything.
>
> >> + s390x:s390x)
> >> + return 0
> >> + ;;
> >> + esac
> >> + return 1
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +supported_xen_target() {
> >> + test "$xen" = "yes" || return 1
> >> + glob "$1" "*-softmmu" || return 1
> >> + case "${1%-softmmu}:$cpu" in
> >> + arm:arm | aarch64:aarch64 | \
> >> + i386:i386 | i386:x86_64 | x86_64:i386 | x86_64:x86_64)
> > This again is claiming support for 64-bit guests with Xen on a
> > 32-bit host, which AFAIK is impossible.
>
> 32-bit dom0 with 64-bit guests actually is not only possible, but also
> widely used.
Oh, i guess I'm missing the distinction between 64-bit hypervisor vs
32-bit dom-0, which still lets you use 64-bit dom-U.
In that case,
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|