qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerat


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.10] boot-serial-test: prefer tcg accelerator
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:20:46 +1000
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:35:17AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 August 2017 at 09:49, Laurent Vivier <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On 22/08/2017 10:47, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 22 August 2017 at 02:09, David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>>> On 16 August 2017 at 11:51, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> On 16/08/2017 10:26, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>>>> Prefer to use the tcg accelarator if it is available: This is our only
> >>>>>> real smoke test for tcg, and fast enough to use it for that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm not sure this is required for 2.10.  Yes, it means the coverage from
> >>>>> "make check" is worse, but that's it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, I'd put it under "if we need to roll an rc4 anyway for
> >>>> some more significant bug we might as well put this in too,
> >>>> but it doesn't merit cutting rc4 by itself."
> >>>
> >>> It does entirely break "make check" on a ppc host.  And that in turn
> >>> has held up my testing cycle for a couple of ppc regressions from 2.9
> >>> that I was hoping to squeeze in.  Does that change your calculations?
> >>
> >> I have a PPC64 box in my standard set of build tests, and it
> >> runs 'make check' without problems...
> >
> > You need to use KVM HV to have the problem, not KVM PR.
> > Is that the case?
> 
> I don't have access to KVM at all on that box, so it will be
> using TCG only.

That would explain it, it's the attempt to use KVM that triggers the
problem.

Obviously it's not a thing to fix right now, but I've really been
thinking that none of the tests should use this "TCG or KVM" stuff.
They should instead be run with *both* options - or at least the ones
that are available on the host.

That would have caught the bug in the pull request I sent you, and
would at least have given you a chance at seeing the problem with
boot-serial-test.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]