qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Mark devices as non-hotpluggable by de


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Mark devices as non-hotpluggable by default
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:19:17 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 25.09.2017 16:34, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:31:53 -0300
>> Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:53:16PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:16:34 +0200
>>>> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>> Historically we've marked all devices as hotpluggable by default. However,
>>>>> most devices are not hotpluggable, and you also need a HotplugHandler to
>>>>> support these devices. So if the user tries to "device_add" or 
>>>>> "device_del"
>>>>> such a non-hotpluggable device during runtime, either nothing really 
>>>>> usable
>>>>> happens, or QEMU even crashes/aborts unexpectedly (see for example commit
>>>>> 84ebd3e8c7d4fe955b - "Mark diag288 watchdog as non-hotpluggable").
>>>>> So let's change this dangerous default behaviour and mark the devices as
>>>>> non-hotpluggable by default. Certain parent devices classes which are 
>>>>> known
>>>>> as hotpluggable (e.g. PCI, USB, etc.) are marked with "hotpluggable = 
>>>>> true",
>>>>> so that devices that are derived from these classes continue to work as
>>>>> expected.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  v2: Add missing devices and dropped "RFC" status. See Eduardo's reply on
>>>>>  the previous version of this patch for the rationale which devices need
>>>>>  to be hotpluggable:
>>>>>  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg06128.html
>>>>>
>>>>>  hw/char/virtio-serial-bus.c   |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/core/qdev.c                | 10 ++++------
>>>>>  hw/mem/nvdimm.c               |  3 +++
>>>>>  hw/mem/pc-dimm.c              |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/pci/pci.c                  |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c       |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/s390x/ccw-device.c         |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c            |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/usb/bus.c                  |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/usb/dev-smartcard-reader.c |  1 +
>>>>>  hw/xen/xen_backend.c          |  1 +
>>>>>  target/i386/cpu.c             |  4 ++--
>>>>>  target/s390x/cpu.c            |  1 +
>>>>>  13 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)  
>>>>
>>>> Hm, this seems to break hotplug of virtio devices:
>>>>
>>>> (qemu) device_add virtio-net-pci,id=xxx
>>>> Device 'virtio-net-device' does not support hotplugging
>>>>
>>>> (qemu) device_add virtio-net-ccw,id=yyy
>>>> Device 'virtio-net-device' does not support hotplugging
>>>>
>>>> We probably need to enable hotplug for virtio devices as well?  

D'oh, I only checked "normal" PCI devices, not the ones like virtio
devices that consist of two devices internally :-/

>>> I've seen a similar case broken by "[PATCH] hw/core/qdev: Do not
>>> allow hot-plugging without hotplug controller", because we're
>>> blocking creation of devices created internally by other devices,
>>> not just the ones created by device_add.  I need to find the
>>> exact reproducer again.
>>>
>>> It would probably simplify things if we move the check for
>>> DeviceClass::hotpluggable to qmp_device_add(), instead of
>>> device_set_realized().
>> if we would have to do that, than we are probably doing
>> something wrong and not using property right. Perhaps we
>> should fix property instead of trying find a place to check
>> it where it would hurt less.
> 
> I disagree.  It depends on the purpose and semantics we define
> for DeviceClass::hotpluggable.  My goal is to have a reliable way
> to tell the user if a device really supports device_add, and I
> think it wouldn't make sense to report hotpluggable=true on a
> device that is never instantiated directly by the user and only
> used internally.

I think an alternative was would maybe be to check for "user_creatable"
in device_set_realized() in addition to "hotpluggable": If
user_creatable is false, we can be sure that it is an internal plugging
only. Not sure whether this works for the virtio-xxx-device devices,
though, since they are marked as user_creatable = true currently...

 Thomas



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]