[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2017 10:21:32 +0000 |
On 13 November 2017 at 10:03, Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> One of the sweeping change for 3.0 could be to stop to maintaining
> migration compatibility with older versions (2.x). Even if the
> feature is really a must have in some cluster environment, the
> code (and the developer) is starting to suffer from it.
We certainly can't just drop all migration-compat. The closest
we might come would be to say we dropped migration-compat
from versions older than $X for some value of X.
But this kind of discussion is what I mean -- various
people have different ideas about what we might or might
not drop, but we need to come to a consensus about what
we can actually do first.
thanks
-- PMM
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.12 v3 00/11] spapr: introduce an IRQ allocator at the machine level, Cédric Le Goater, 2017/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type), Cornelia Huck, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type), Peter Maydell, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ?, Thomas Huth, 2017/11/23