qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] vhost-scsi: add missing virtqueue_size para


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] vhost-scsi: add missing virtqueue_size parameter
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 02:59:09 +0200

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:00:45PM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/04/2017 01:05 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 4 December 2017 at 17:52, Eric Farman <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On 12/01/2017 10:16 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On 01/12/2017 16:15, Eric Farman wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > index cd4ab05233..9c1bea8ff3 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ static Property vhost_scsi_properties[] = {
> > > > >        DEFINE_PROP_STRING("wwpn", VirtIOSCSICommon, conf.wwpn),
> > > > >        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("boot_tpgt", VirtIOSCSICommon, 
> > > > > conf.boot_tpgt,
> > > > > 0),
> > > > >        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num_queues", VirtIOSCSICommon, 
> > > > > conf.num_queues,
> > > > > 1),
> > > > > +    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("virtqueue_size", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.virtqueue_size,
> > > > > +                       128),
> > > > >        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_sectors", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.max_sectors,
> > > > >                           0xFFFF),
> > > > >        DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("cmd_per_lun", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.cmd_per_lun, 128),
> > 
> > > Wow, super quick, thank you!  Seeing conversations today, is this queued 
> > > for
> > > -rc4, or 2.12 and backport to qemu-stable?
> > 
> > If people can come to a consensus on whether this is -rc4 material
> > by Tuesday 12:00 GMT that would be helpful.
> 
> I'd vote for -rc4, since it's a new guest crash since 2.10.

I think so too.

>  But I also
> won't complain if it waits for 2.11.1 since I was out of the office during
> the whole freeze period and no one else noticed it.
> 
>  - Eric




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]