qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/12] hw/pci: introduce pci_device_notify_io


From: Liu, Yi L
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/12] hw/pci: introduce pci_device_notify_iommu()
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:46:52 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:27:43PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:33:31PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > -void pci_setup_iommu(PCIBus *bus, PCIIOMMUFunc fn, void *opaque)
> > +void pci_device_notify_iommu(PCIDevice *dev, PCIDevNotifyType type)
> >  {
> > -    bus->iommu_fn = fn;
> > +    PCIBus *bus = PCI_BUS(pci_get_bus(dev));
> > +    PCIBus *iommu_bus = bus;
> > +
> > +    while (iommu_bus && !iommu_bus->iommu_fn && iommu_bus->parent_dev) {
> > +        iommu_bus = PCI_BUS(pci_get_bus(iommu_bus->parent_dev));
> > +    }
> > +    if (iommu_bus && iommu_bus->notify_fn) {
> > +        iommu_bus->notify_fn(bus,
> > +                             iommu_bus->iommu_opaque,
> > +                             dev->devfn,
> > +                             type);
> 
> We didn't really check the return code for notify function.  What if
> it failed?  If we care, we'd better handle the failure; or we can just
> define the notify_fn() to return void (now it's int).

Good catch. I think we need to handle failure. User should be aware of
it. I'll try to add accordingly in next version.
 
> > +    }
> > +    return;
> 
> I saw many places in the series that you added explicit return for
> "void" return-typed functions.  IMHO all of them can be dropped.

Thanks for spotting it, would fix them in next version.

Regards,
Yi Liu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]