qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/56] json: Reject unescaped control characters


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/56] json: Reject unescaped control characters
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:26:24 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:

> On 08/08/2018 07:02 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Fix the lexer to reject unescaped control characters in JSON strings,
>> in accordance with RFC 7159.
>
> Question - can this break existing QMP clients that were relying on
> this extension working?

In theory, yes.

The "extension" is undocumented.  That makes it a bug.

I'm not aware of clients relying on it.

> Libvirt used to use libyajl, now it uses libjansson. So I'll check
> both of those libraries:
>
> yajl: https://github.com/lloyd/yajl/blob/master/src/yajl_encode.c#L32
>
>             default:
>                 if ((unsigned char) str[end] < 32) {
>                     CharToHex(str[end], hexBuf + 4);
> escaped = hexBuf;
>
> jansson: https://github.com/akheron/jansson/blob/master/src/dump.c#L101
>
>             /* mandatory escape or control char */
> if(codepoint == '\\' || codepoint == '"' || codepoint < 0x20)
>
> Okay, both libraries appear to always send control characters encoded,
> and thus were not relying on this accidental QMP extension.
>
> Are we worried about other clients?

Breakage seems unlikely to me.

>> Bonus: we now recover more nicely from unclosed strings.  E.g.
>>
>>      {"one: 1}\n{"two": 2}
>>
>> now recovers cleanly after the newline, where before the lexer
>> remained confused until the next unpaired double quote or lexical
>> error.
>
> On that grounds alone, I could live with this patch, even if we end up
> having to revert it later if some client was actually depending on
> sending raw control characters as part of a string.

Having to revert the patch to stay bug-compatible wouldn't be exactly
terrible.

> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

Thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]