qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bi


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/13] tests: acpi: make pointer to RSDP 64bit
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:38:03 +0200

On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 15:31:42 +0800
Wei Yang <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:34:39AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >In case of UEFI, RSDP doesn't have to be located in lowmem,
> >it could be placed at any address. Make sure that test won't
> >break if it is placed above the first 4Gb of address space.
> >
> >PS:
> >While at it cleanup some local variables as we don't really
> >need them.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
> >---
> >v2:
> >  - s/In case of UEFI/In case of UEFI,/ (Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>)
> >---
> > tests/bios-tables-test.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >index 2ee044c..c29dcf4 100644
> >--- a/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >+++ b/tests/bios-tables-test.c
> >@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > typedef struct {
> >     const char *machine;
> >     const char *variant;
> >-    uint32_t rsdp_addr;
> >+    uint64_t rsdp_addr;
> >     uint8_t rsdp_table[36 /* ACPI 2.0+ RSDP size */];
> >     GArray *tables;
> >     uint32_t smbios_ep_addr;
> >@@ -86,13 +86,11 @@ static void test_acpi_rsdp_address(test_data *data)
> > 
> > static void test_acpi_rsdp_table(test_data *data)
> > {
> >-    uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table, revision;
> >-    uint32_t addr = data->rsdp_addr;
> >+    uint8_t *rsdp_table = data->rsdp_table;
> > 
> >-    acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, addr, rsdp_table);
> >-    revision = rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */];
> >+    acpi_fetch_rsdp_table(data->qts, data->rsdp_addr, rsdp_table);  
> 
> Ok, I think this is the reason you change the second parameter from uint32_t
> to uint64_t in 1st patch.
> 
> Maybe we need to move that on to this one?
Sure.
There is one additional path to make 64-bit table pointers support a bit more 
complete.
I'll respin series once travis build passes.

 
> > 
> >-    switch (revision) {
> >+    switch (rsdp_table[15 /* Revision offset */]) {
> >     case 0: /* ACPI 1.0 RSDP */
> >         /* With rev 1, checksum is only for the first 20 bytes */
> >         g_assert(!acpi_calc_checksum(rsdp_table,  20));
> >-- 
> >2.7.4  
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]