qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/42] target/arm: Move NS TBFLAG from bit 19 to bit


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 19/42] target/arm: Move NS TBFLAG from bit 19 to bit 6
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:00:07 +0100

Move the NS TBFLAG down from bit 19 to bit 6, which has not
been used since commit c1e3781090b9d36c60 in 2015, when we
started passing the entire MMU index in the TB flags rather
than just a 'privilege level' bit.

This rearrangement is not strictly necessary, but means that
we can put M-profile-only bits next to each other rather
than scattered across the flag word.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
Message-id: address@hidden
---
 target/arm/cpu.h | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index eb989d773af..0ea448034b3 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3138,6 +3138,12 @@ FIELD(TBFLAG_ANY, BE_DATA, 23, 1)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, THUMB, 0, 1)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VECLEN, 1, 3)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VECSTRIDE, 4, 2)
+/*
+ * Indicates whether cp register reads and writes by guest code should access
+ * the secure or nonsecure bank of banked registers; note that this is not
+ * the same thing as the current security state of the processor!
+ */
+FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, NS, 6, 1)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, VFPEN, 7, 1)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, CONDEXEC, 8, 8)
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, SCTLR_B, 16, 1)
@@ -3145,11 +3151,6 @@ FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, SCTLR_B, 16, 1)
  * checks on the other bits at runtime
  */
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, XSCALE_CPAR, 17, 2)
-/* Indicates whether cp register reads and writes by guest code should access
- * the secure or nonsecure bank of banked registers; note that this is not
- * the same thing as the current security state of the processor!
- */
-FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, NS, 19, 1)
 /* For M profile only, Handler (ie not Thread) mode */
 FIELD(TBFLAG_A32, HANDLER, 21, 1)
 /* For M profile only, whether we should generate stack-limit checks */
-- 
2.20.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]