[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-discuss] qemu make
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-discuss] qemu make |
Date: |
Thu, 3 May 2018 10:02:54 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) |
On Thu, 05/03 08:05, lizhuoyao wrote:
> So,how can I get qemu-kvm binary exe? Actually,there are
> qemu-ga,qemu-io...but no qemu-kvm.
>
> The reason why I need the qemu-kvm is that the result of virsh with showing
> "cannot check QEMU binary /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm:no such fileor directory".And
> I find qemu-kvm in the top level of filesystem: find / -name qemu-kvm, shows
> empty.
>
> Or there is some wrong with order?the version of libvirt is 3.2.0
If this question come from experiences using RHEL / CentOS,
/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm is where the qemu-system-x86_64 binary gets packaged by
the distros. You can let libvirt use /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64, with a
line in the domain xml (virsh edit $vm):
<devices>
...
<emulator>/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator>
Fam
>
>
> --
> Have a good day
>
>
>
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> > 发送时间: 2018年5月2日 星期三
> > 收件人: lizhuoyao <address@hidden>
> > 抄送: qemu-discuss <address@hidden>, shengyizju <address@hidden>
> > 主题: Re: Re: Re: [Qemu-discuss] qemu make
> >
> > On 2 May 2018 at 12:09, lizhuoyao <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > A more question:does the qemu from download.qemu.org include qemu-kvm?
> > > There
> > > was no qemu-kvm exe after I made it.
> > > my order:./configure --target-list=arm-softmmu --enabled-debug
> > > --enable-kvm
> > > --enable-vnc;make;make install
> > > Or, where can i get the code of qemu-kvm? I get
> > > git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git/, but the latest version is
> > > 2.3.0?
> >
> > qemu-kvm was a fork of QEMU which added KVM support, but it has
> > merged back into QEMU some years ago. The standard QEMU
> > executables will use KVM if you pass -enable-kvm on their
> > command line.
> >
> > (Note that KVM will only work if the host and guest architecture
> > are the same, eg arm-on-arm or x86-on-x86.)
> >
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
>
>
>