qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] qemu-pcc 2.8.0 linux-user segfaults


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] qemu-pcc 2.8.0 linux-user segfaults
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:30:23 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:25:05PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 January 2017 at 23:52, Sam Bobroff <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> On 01/16/2017 03:56 PM, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >> > I'm trying to upgrade qemu to 2.8.0 in Openembedded-core and segfaults
> >> > in qemu-ppc when is executing:
> 
> > I've recently encountered a similar problem and I've posted a fix. If
> > you'd like to try it, it's here:
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2017-01/msg00413.html
> 
> Hmm, I missed that patch (it doesn't seem to have made it
> to the qemu-devel list), but it isn't correct, I'm afraid.
> In the patch for handling TARGET_USER_ESIGRETURN you must
> not change the nip register, because we will have just
> set it from the signal context that the guest provided
> to the sigreturn syscall. (The patch as it stands will
> cause us to reexecute an instruction after return from
> a signal handler, which isn't going to go very well).
> 
> David, can you drop that patch from your ppc queue, please?

Ok, dropped, pending discussion of what the right fix is.

> (I think the change is good otherwise but I couldn't
> seem to find the bit in the ppc linux kernel that
> corresponds to moving the NIP value around.)
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]