[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation
From: |
Joseph Coffland |
Subject: |
Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:54:39 -0500 |
Per Bother,
The more I've looked around at Qexo the more I've realized that providing
an alternative to TreeList is not practical. Much of the code depends on
AbstractSequence. BTW using a string table could improve TreeLists
storage
requirements even further.
It seems that you could get fragmentation in the TreeList object array if
deleting were possible. Then you might want maintain a freelist.
In a lot of ways memory management is much easier in C/C++.
Joseph
--
Joseph Coffland
address@hidden
- [Qexo-general] TreeList implementation, Joseph Coffland, 2004/02/24
- [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Per Bothner, 2004/02/24
- [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Joseph Coffland, 2004/02/24
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Per Bothner, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation,
Joseph Coffland <=
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Per Bothner, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Joseph Coffland, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Per Bothner, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Qexo-general] Re: TreeList implementation, Joseph Coffland, 2004/02/26
- [Qexo-general] Possible variable scoping bug, Joseph Coffland, 2004/02/26
- [Qexo-general] Re: Possible variable scoping bug, Per Bothner, 2004/02/26