repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak


From: Aaron Wolf
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:24:29 -0700

On 04/12/2016 01:17 PM, Andrew Ferguson wrote:
> I have just checked, and the inbuilt license chooser that appears when
> creating a new repository now emphasizes GPL v3 over v2 - just like
> choosealicense.com. However, the default is still 'none'.
> 

Great! Having no license default isn't the GNU preference, but it's not
aggressive or anything.

> On 12/04/16 20:58, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> Yes, GitHub's choosealicense thing has seen major improvements that
>> better respect GPL, emphasize v3, etc. Yay!
>>
>> However, I don't know anything about the status of their built-in
>> add-a-license tool in GitHub itself and whether that still (if it did
>> before) promotes GPL v2 over v3
>>
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]