repo-criteria-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (ak


From: Mike Gerwitz
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] What's needed to publish the evaluations (aka the longest email ever {aka two specific tasks})}
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:56:54 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux)

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 13:24:29 -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>> choosealicense.com. However, the default is still 'none'.
>> 
>
> Great! Having no license default isn't the GNU preference, but it's not
> aggressive or anything.

The lack of a license means that the software is proprietary, so that's
worse than them choosing another free software license.

So "none" is really bad.

-- 
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]