rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] RULE + RH7.2 + UPDATES ?


From: CLOTILDE Guy Daniel
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] RULE + RH7.2 + UPDATES ?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:48:54 +0400

Hi
I agree with you that static RPMs are a good thing, but for machines whom dd 
can be changed to a 20 or 30 Go one for only a few bucks. But Laptops often 
can't do that.

Cheers

> I think this is where Marco's concept of static rpm builds could help... why 
> not have those libs uniquely needed by the app that may not be on the box 
> included with the app and put into /usr/local/lib.  Some libs... this won't 
> work for (like gcc) but others (python 1.5 and 2.0 for example) can coexist.  
> But if you build static the application and it's lib are one.  Lousy for 
> really low mem boxes (170mb hdd) but if the user has say a 2 gig or better, 
> the small increase in size would make up for the hassle of finding all of 
> those *$^&^ libs.
> 
> James
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Martin Stricker
> > -- 
> > Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
> > Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rule-list mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]