[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] RULE + RH7.2 + UPDATES ?
From: |
CLOTILDE Guy Daniel |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] RULE + RH7.2 + UPDATES ? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 10:48:54 +0400 |
Hi
I agree with you that static RPMs are a good thing, but for machines whom dd
can be changed to a 20 or 30 Go one for only a few bucks. But Laptops often
can't do that.
Cheers
> I think this is where Marco's concept of static rpm builds could help... why
> not have those libs uniquely needed by the app that may not be on the box
> included with the app and put into /usr/local/lib. Some libs... this won't
> work for (like gcc) but others (python 1.5 and 2.0 for example) can coexist.
> But if you build static the application and it's lib are one. Lousy for
> really low mem boxes (170mb hdd) but if the user has say a 2 gig or better,
> the small increase in size would make up for the hassle of finding all of
> those *$^&^ libs.
>
> James
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Martin Stricker
> > --
> > Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
> > Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rule-list mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
[Rule-list] Re: And now for a special announcement...(Nailed it!), Devon, 2002/02/19
Re: [Rule-list] And now for a special announcement...(Nailed it!), Brock Organ, 2002/02/20
Re: [Rule-list] And now for a special announcement...(Nailed it!), Brock Organ, 2002/02/20