Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question

[Martin Stricker]

Devon wrote:

> I've reverted to full file names in the package lists, so the install
> needs the packages from the official 7.2 release. Including updates
> will break it. I do however also have lists generated (and a script to
> automate the list creation process) for a fully updated set of
> packages.

Why this step back?
 
> On another topic entirely, none of the scripts to date included any
> copyright information. Most scripts and software I've found anywhere
> contain this info.
> 
> So, I added a copyright stanza to the top of each script, naming
> myself and the RULE project. Thoughts, comments, objections?

Perfect, with one addition needed:



> # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> # along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> # Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307,
> USA.

Link to the GPL here, I think it's http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/ , but
I'm not sure.

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Red Hat Linux 7.2 for low memory: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/