rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question


From: Devon
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] New slinky images, copyright question
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 14:43:11 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 28 March 2002 07:04 pm, James wrote:

> Yes but like the GPL BSD prohibts changing the license on the code
> to another open source license.  Otherwise I could take gcc tack the
> BSD license on it and call it propriatory.  If the code is
> originally under the BSD License it must stay under that license.

My understanding, (and I am not a lawyer) is that under the BSD license, 
you can take BSD licensed code, make modifications, and add additional 
restrictions to it's use. This is prohibited under the GPL license.

While the BSD license is considered compatible with the GPL, it is not 
categorized as a 'copyleft' license. 
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html

As for including both licenses, that doesn't seem possible. It falls 
under either one or the other.

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 6M of RAM: http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/rule/

- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8phVPeMAUbzJhSVcRAtJNAKC5UPBh79aZovaAP8/h/3ikfgeLsgCdFH9g
zEJ9xlOCYN+QtOPKzDBcyTs=
=1KqS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]