[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RULE] Bloated software: solutions?
From: |
M. Fioretti |
Subject: |
Re: [RULE] Bloated software: solutions? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:02:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 22:31:23 at 10:31:23PM +0200, DervishD (address@hidden)
wrote:
> After that, go for the kernel. But believe me: you won't need to
> touch any line of code there. The best you can do is making sure you
> have a sensible configuration, putting into modules as much as you
> can and make a lean kernel with many features.
Precisely. That's why my highest ambition, as far as RULE and the
Linux kernel are concerned, is to have somebody telling us how to
tweak the Red Hat kernel RPM spec file to achieve just what you say.
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
--
Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/
A dream will always triumph over reality, once it is given the chance.
Stanislaw Lem
- Re: [RULE] Distro thoughts, (continued)
- [RULE] Distro thoughts...for debian, M. Fioretti, 2003/10/17
- Re: [RULE] Distro thoughts...for debian, DervishD, 2003/10/17
- [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?), James Miller (office), 2003/10/20
- Re: [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?), DervishD, 2003/10/20
- Re: [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?), M. Fioretti, 2003/10/20
- Re: [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?), Paul Nijjar, 2003/10/21
- Re: [RULE] Hi everybody, M. Fioretti, 2003/10/17
- [RULE] Bloated software: solutions?, DervishD, 2003/10/17
- Re: [RULE] Bloated software: solutions?,
M. Fioretti <=
- Re: [RULE] Bloated software: solutions?, DervishD, 2003/10/17
- Re: [RULE] Hi everybody, DervishD, 2003/10/17