[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?)
From: |
M. Fioretti |
Subject: |
Re: [RULE] Reflections on a Debianized RULE (or RULE'ized Debian?) |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:10:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 17:06:39 at 05:06:39PM +0000, James Miller
(address@hidden) wrote:
> Well, maybe all this just got easier? Maybe miniconda or even
> slinky can be made to work just as well for Debian as it does for
> RH/Fedora? News item from
> http://arstechnica.com/archive/news/1067056799.html
Well, this is interesting indeed. Thanks for the link.
I will leave comments on doing "slinky for debian" to Michael
(consider however that this he now works mainly on slinky, not on the
anaconda spin-off).
In any case this is good also because it means that making packages
for both distributions may become easier, hence allowing more sharing
of info on how to install efficient packages.
Ciao,
Marco Fioretti
--
Marco Fioretti m.fioretti, at the server inwind.it
Red Hat for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/en/
People often find it easier to be a result of the past than a cause of
the future.