Re: [Savannah-hackers] Curiosity question, low priority

[Bradley M. Kuhn]

Loic Dachary <address@hidden> wrote:

>       Technically speaking it means that natively private projects have
> no passwd file (hence the licensing-qa message) where natively public
> projects have a passwd file (hence the cr-reg message).
>
>       This discrepency has no consequence on the privacy of the project
> itself which is enforced by the permission bits at the CVSROOT
> (/cvsroot/licensing-qa and /cvsroot/cr-reg).
>
>       Thanks for checking and reporting this. I was not able to say
> immediately that it was normal and I had to check, which is good.

Thanks for your quick reply on something that really wasn't that urgent.
;)

This all sounds fine to me, but it would be useful if this were documented
somewhere.  Is there a section yet in the savannah docs about "private
projects"?



   -- bkuhn

pgpXsenplwPXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature