Re: [Savannah-hackers] submission of Savannah - Next Generation - savannah.gnu.org

[Hugo Gayosso]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> writes:

> Since nobody gave any valid reason to move to GForge, I am still  
> opposed to that. I am still waiting an answer from Bradley and the  
> sysadmins to an e-mail I sent twice at the end of the migration/merging  
> discussion.

I agree with Sylvain, and by the way, I haven't received any response
from anybody other than RMS (other than agreeing that there was some
lack of communication problems it provided no more information)
regarding this issue either.


So far what are your plans for continuing developing Savannah's code?

If there are no replies regarding GForge, do you guys think that we
should propose merging (or adopting) the latest version of 'savane'?

I think we should decide this soon before your fork of the Savannah
code becomes too different from 'savane' and then we end up with three
similar projects: Savannah, savane and GForge.

Greetings,
- -- 
Hugo Gayosso
GNU Software Evaluators Coordinator
http://www.gnu.org


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAouMQMNObVRBZveYRAuPcAJ4hbuWO8aYeC79mLbNls1xlsw8rNQCfRkGw
bboOEFLlCsejRjwFXP4mnHQ=
=nBrn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----