savannah-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-help-public] [gnu.org #391056] Re: [Fwd: Mail delivery failed:


From: Yavor Doganov via RT
Subject: [Savannah-help-public] [gnu.org #391056] Re: [Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:39:02 -0400

Hossam Hossny wrote:
> This looks like something to drive savannah-hackers attention to

Actually no, the sysadmins are the ones who can fix this.

Some time ago, they added a size restriction in order to reduce
excessive bandwith resulting from large messages occasionally sent to
the lists.  This affected commits with huge diffs, and we agreed
subsequently to ignore messages exceeding the default size limit if
they originate from Savannah:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2008-12/msg00000.html

Apparently this stopped working since at least few months, and I
intended to reraise the issue again.  (I'm adding the RT ticket number
to the Subject, which would hopefully reopen it again.)

Full headers of the bounced message:

Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:44:00 -0400
From: Mail Delivery System <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

   address@hidden

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
------ The body of the message is 275986 characters long; only the first
------ 106496 or so are included here.

Return-path: <address@hidden>
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1NwMkO-0004Z6-Sa
        for address@hidden; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:44:00 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE
        autolearn=no version=3.3.0
Received: from colonialone.fsf.org ([140.186.70.51]:53101 
helo=internal.in.savannah.gnu.org)
        by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1NwMkO-0004Z2-FV
        for address@hidden; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:43:48 -0400
Received: from [10.1.0.108] (helo=vcs-noshell.in.savannah.gnu.org)
        by internal.in.savannah.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1NwMkN-0002kH-KG
        for address@hidden; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:43:47 +0000
Received: from mbf by vcs-noshell.in.savannah.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id 1NwMkN-0000a6-Gg
        for address@hidden; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:43:47 +0000
To: address@hidden
Subject: www/gnu/po gnu-linux-faq.ar.po
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
From: Hossam Hossny <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:43:47 +0000
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]