savannah-register-public
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-register-public] [task #9791] Submission of ForgePlucker


From: Nicodemo Alvaro
Subject: [Savannah-register-public] [task #9791] Submission of ForgePlucker
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:07:36 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009090216

Follow-up Comment #4, task #9791 (project administration):

It just recently clicked in my head that the big reason why we require a
clear and precise license notice is that many projects have a file called
COPYING and so this will create a mess when there is a project that includes
your code or vice versa. Does that to you justify the need for the full
modified BSD license notice? If not I still have not received your indication
of why. Have you already submitted it to address@hidden 

For the record, I privately sent you the below message.

> Yes, please send me your explanation. I will send the message to
> licensing and cc you and savannah-hackers. How does that sound?
> 
> There are a few things I was thinking about that to them make it
> essential to have the full license. If you see the GNU GPL license
> notice you will see that there are three things defined. There is no
> warranty, where you can get the license if it was not given to you, and
> which license the program is under. Free software allows you to copy
> any part of the code. Since the code and license are separate it's easy
> to forget to copy the license.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9791>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]