[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Simulavr-devel] Suggestion for ./configure
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
[Simulavr-devel] Suggestion for ./configure |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:13:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
When I specify --with-bfd-path to ./configure, it then comes back to
me, asking for --with-libiberty-path. As BFD explicitly requires GNU
binutils libiberty (as they are using internal, undocumented functions
from it), wouldn't it make sense to default --with-libiberty-path to
the path name given for --with-bfd-path unless specifically overridden
on the commandline? They are likely to live side by side anyway,
coming from the same binutils package.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Simulavr-devel] Suggestion for ./configure,
Joerg Wunsch <=