simulavr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Simulavr-devel] Suggestion for ./configure


From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: [Simulavr-devel] Suggestion for ./configure
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:13:31 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

When I specify --with-bfd-path to ./configure, it then comes back to
me, asking for --with-libiberty-path.  As BFD explicitly requires GNU
binutils libiberty (as they are using internal, undocumented functions
from it), wouldn't it make sense to default --with-libiberty-path to
the path name given for --with-bfd-path unless specifically overridden
on the commandline?  They are likely to live side by side anyway,
coming from the same binutils package.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]