[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
From: |
Joel Sherrill |
Subject: |
[Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:42:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) |
Hi,
I would like to make sure simulavrxx has all
the capabilities avrtest and simulavr have.
I am more familiar with avrtest and think
these are the current deficiencies:
+ no maximum run limit
+ no magic "exit" port
+ no magic "abort" port
Are there other issues? I have almost finished
addressing those.
What is the list of reasons to use simulavr
over simulavrxx?
I don't know how many I will be able to address
given the scope of what I am supposed to be
doing but it would be nice to have a roadmap
that makes simulavrxx the preferred FOSS AVR
simulator.
This roadmap (aka open projects) is also
needed by Google Summer of Code students
when hunting projects.
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
address@hidden On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
- [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx,
Joel Sherrill <=
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11