Re: [Simulavr-devel] Settings for stackpointer

[Albrecht Frenzel]

How many users of simulavr recently use  it (or plan) to simulate 
tiny11/12/15 or at90s1200?

Does anybody know, how many people really use simulavr?


On 21.02.2016 08:18, Klaus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > > So the question is: is there a need to implement tiny11/12/15?
> > > (at90s1200 is to old, I think) If not, then we should remove this
> > > implementation.
> >
> > I think they're all obsolete now.
>
> Please do not remove things which are working. There are so many 
> features dropped in the last years. So please do not drop this 
> features!!!! I have no idea why killing features is so funny. I 
> have so much trouble to bring the features later in again. Look 
> for IRQ which was broken without any sense. The serial interface 
> was broken, the trace output is still broken. All these things 
> have worked a long time but are all gone.
>
> So please stop doing that!
>
> Regards
>  Klaus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Simulavr-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel