spamass-milt-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?


From: Steve
Subject: Re: Rewriting header incorrectly?
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:17:05 +0000

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 01:19 -0600, Daniel Norton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Steve
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>         
>         Can you tell me where in RFC2821 it says that there should be
>         a
>         semi-colon before the time stamp?
> 
> 
> Section 4.4, "Trace Information" at this ABNF:
>         Time-stamp-line = "Received:" FWS Stamp <CRLF>
>         
>         Stamp = From-domain By-domain Opt-info ";"  FWS date-time
> --
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spamass-milt-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
I don't dispute that it's laid out that way - but if I look at all the
mail I have coming in via Postfix and the milter - in particular
'RECEIVED' headers, I'm not seeing any ';' in the datestamps anywhere.
For example, your last mail in:

Am I missing something here???????

Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id
 1NFjVG-00016u-JQ for address@hidden; Wed, 02 Dec 2009
 02:19:58 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id
 1NFjVB-00012f-DV for address@hidden; Wed, 02 Dec 2009
 02:19:57 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45606 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
by
 lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFjVB-00012U-58 for
 address@hidden; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:19:53 -0500
Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:55977) by
 monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from
 <address@hidden>) id 1NFjVA-0003L2-Mi for
address@hidden;
 Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:19:53 -0500
Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so5204272fxm.10 for
 <address@hidden>; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:19:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=gamma;
 h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
 :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=cqiwS1hFxAVOmTzdLA7M0iSE9cfDpgCxSEFs0JY6O04=;
 b=EBC2BYnRqPZAeRUePqKmkrik+5t5XhWNucnuVzFlpHIZYpnun6RMi64zEAGmdIxNUa
 8Mq4sSxOs3OV48EdUCVP9eaTZ7n6Yto+q9EUZU53scUQ02hwEPoG8F7Ng59J6zuDGvLN
 dMAR0UOCNlv0tihBOaSQcryvxi/4WyGm5WrNQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 b=YK0MVvyg2iQ533zDAolw0IkfUqUSh+Cnf7/dKe423x4aKJfV4Ymb9ZxKRZCvsMJMI/
 SttI575hv7Cc+jSy4iq2tKsQzdCglPIcWlhPPkoh1f0XEhX2EhBc4+pz1lUuoseDR675
 CiDdlKfdnAka+VZKgaqnESX7SBUzAKdamnCaM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.143.212 with SMTP id
l20mr656602hba.210.1259738391400; 
 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:19:51 -0800 (PST)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]